Monday, March 30, 2015

Christian Apologetics in the Second Century

          Christian Apologetics in the second century was the beginning of the defense of Christianity; it argues for the “superiority of Christian morals” and establishes Christians as the most desirable people because of their belief system that makes them trustworthy, hardworking, and conscientious citizenry.[1] Apologists were defenders of the faith, they answered charges (often trumped up or exaggerated) against Christians, and plead for tolerance, and especially that Christians were being persecuted simply because of “the name,” they were referred to - Christians.[2] But more than that, apologetics were intent on proving that Christianity was a legitimate religion and based it on the OT scriptures, it was not a new religion or a novelty as they were being accused but rather “the original religion of humanity.”[3]
            Nonetheless, Christians were accused of many things; the calamities thrust upon the pagans of the Greco-Roman empire, obstinacy, and insubordination.[4]  In addition to these they were accused of atheism, cannibalism and incest. Of course these accusations were based on misunderstandings and ignorance; their definition of atheism meant to not observe the pagan practices of worship, their lack of understanding of the Eucharist caused them to cry cannibalism, and the idea that Christians are brothers and sisters in Christ led to the claim of incest.[5]
            The most significant apologist of this time was Justin Martyr. He responds to the charges brought against Christians by expressing that they are moral, very moral in fact not immoral as the pagans wrongly believed.[6] He goes on to argue “from the antiquity of the Jewish Scriptures and the fulfillment of their prophecies in Christianity.”[7] Justin wanted to use the philosophy of the Greeks in conjunction with Christianity to help the pagans understand and embrace this way of life. He would use the OT to prove Christianity. [8]  His heart was to reach the non-Christian, in fact, the empire as a whole. Unlike Tatian, who desired to burn bridges says Ferguson, Justin wanted to connect Jesus to his audience and help them see that Christ was God come to save the world as the incarnate Christ.
            Today the apologetic principle of tolerance would serve our world well. It is interesting to me how so many claim Christianity to be “intolerant” and yet we as a people group are more despised than terrorist. Harsh, I know. It is sad how Christians are discriminated against, singled out, and even sought out for persecution because its core value is to believe in a God who desires everyone to love him, worship him, and be with him so that he might bless his own with peace, love, and joy.



[1] Everett Ferguson, Church History, Volume One: From Christ to the Pre-Reformation, (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2013), 71.
[2] Ibid., 76.
[3] Ibid., 77.
[4] Ibid., 65.
[5] Ibid., 66.
[6] Ibid., 72.
[7] Ibid.
[8] Ibid., 77.

No comments:

Post a Comment